Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Matthew Whitney's avatar

The Church Website says this about the atonement: "He paid the price of justice so each of us could receive mercy." But I much prefer the schema the Givens have provided. But this very day, we are perpetuating the worst thoughts about the atonement daily in our prose and our very website. How do we overcome this linguistic and dogmatic hold placed upon the Atonement in favor of the more comprehensive and holistic meaning the Givens propose. Is the church website wrong? Dare we say so? Someone needs to challenge the language and scriptures that defy the radical healing notion in favor of penal substitution. Call them out. Enumerate them. Because we are still mired deeply and it causes confusion daily.

No posts

Ready for more?